Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Dennis

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 8, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hazleton, S.

This motion is made by proponent to dismiss the objections filed against the propounded paper, upon the grounds that they are sham and false. The motion is brought under rule 104 of the Buies of Civil Practice which in turn is made applicable to this probate proceeding by section 316 of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The objections filed by a contestant in a Surrogate’s Court proceeding may be considered in the nature of an answer. (Matter of Walsh, 107 Misc. 475.) Therefore, the familiar precedents concerning motions of this type brought in the Supreme Court become controlling here.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HartmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API