Fisk v. Mills
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia. (Dodds, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is a suit upon a promissory note for $210.90, executed by defendant and ber husband to Dr. David Kelley, and by him assigned to plaintiff. The plaintiff, assignee of Dr. Kelley, recovered judgment for the amount of the note.
The fact appearing that defendant was a married woman, the burden rested upon the plaintiff of showing that the consideration of the note passed to her. Fechheimer v. Peirce, 70 Mich. 440. The consideration of the note consisted, in part, of a debt claimed to be owing from defendant, Mrs. Mills, for merchandise furnished upon her sole credit. There was evidence from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fechheimer v. PeirceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Schmidt v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Feather v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Hoffman v. GoldsmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1902