Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Glaccum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1991No. A91A0696Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

This litigation arose out of an automobile collision. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Whiten, 179 Ga. App. 544 (346 SE2d 914) (1986). In a second appearance of these parties before this court, we were called upon to review the trial court’s ruling that Dr. Glaccum, a chiropractor who had treated the plaintiff in the original negligence action and testified at trial, was not required to pay Nationwide, the original plaintiff’s uninsured motorist carrier, four times the amount requested by him as his witness fee as a penalty, under OCGA § 24-10-4, for unjustly claiming more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WhitenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GlaccumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. International Service Insurance v. HarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API