Legal Opinion

Kunkle v. Reeser

Clark County Probate Court

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROCKEL, J..A number of questions have been submitted to the coart in the above matter, the first of which that will be considered is, whether Charles A. Reeser, the assignor, is entitled to §500.CO in lieu of homestead exemption, out of the proceeds of the sale •of real and personal property now in the hands of the assignee.

Charles A. Reeser, the assignor, files the following application which, as it contains a correct statement of the facts as appears from the evidence except that the assignor was a divorced man at the time of the assignment, is quoted in the entirety.

“And now comes the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. German Bank v. SchlothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Jones v. Swan & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Arnold v. WaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sandy Supply Co. v. Superior Petroleum, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API