Legal Opinion

Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. Universal Transportation Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment, entered December 15, 1920, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment, entered December 15, 1920, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff. The plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to equip the steamship Hilonian belonging to the defendant with its system of wireless telegraphy and the defendant agreed to pay a stipulated rental therefor. The contract provided that: “ The wireless apparatus…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Inchaustegui v. 666 5th Avenue Ltd. PartnershipNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Robinson v. JanayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Rodriguez v. NachamieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Carnegie Hall Corp. v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Inchaustegui v. 666 5th Avenue Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API