Legal Opinion

Brogan v. Zummo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff .Santina Brogan appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Niehoff, J.), entered September 30, 1981, as is in favor of defendants Joseph Zummo, Frances A. Poliseno and Anthony Poliseno, dismissing her complaint as to them. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, action severed as between appellant and defendants Zummo and Poliseno, and a new trial granted on the first cause of action asserted in appellant’s verified amended complaint against said defendants and upon the cross…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Green v. DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Tedla v. EllmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Gralton v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. ElimelechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Tepoz v. SosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Callihan v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Palmer v. SmiroldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Crisano v. SpellmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API