Miller v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
In this case, we are called upon to address a purely legal question, involving the interpretation of an insurance policy. The question presented is: whether a four-wheel, half-ton pickup truck, which is used exclusively for pleasure, is an “automobile” as defined in an insurance policy which provides: “The term ‘automobile’ shall mean a four-wheeled passenger motor vehicle exclusively of the pleasure ear type, not operated by the Insured for hire.”
The facts giving rise to the controversy before us are as follows: Ethel Miller, individually and in her capacity as the duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Combined Mutual Cas. Co. v. MethenySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- STATE v. MARCUMCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020