Legal Opinion

Miller v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1978No. 51026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

In this case, we are called upon to address a purely legal question, involving the interpretation of an insurance policy. The question presented is: whether a four-wheel, half-ton pickup truck, which is used exclusively for pleasure, is an “automobile” as defined in an insurance policy which provides: “The term ‘automobile’ shall mean a four-wheeled passenger motor vehicle exclusively of the pleasure ear type, not operated by the Insured for hire.”

The facts giving rise to the controversy before us are as follows: Ethel Miller, individually and in her capacity as the duly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bankers Reserve Life Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Combined Mutual Cas. Co. v. MethenySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. STATE v. MARCUMCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API