Legal Opinion

Schoultz v. Keller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1927Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

LECHE/ J-

Plaintiffs allege in their petition ‘‘that they own certain property .which they -are .informed and believe that Henry Keller is asserting and claiming to •be his, • and that neither they nor Keller are in possession thereof. In argument they say that their action is based upon ;Act 38, p.- 38, of 1908. In our former opinion we treated the action as petitory .in character- and- remanded the case in •order to allow plaintiffs the opportunity ,Jo- make,- proper .parties defendant.

-' 'A rehearing was thereafter granted and the case was again argued and submitted to this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. City of Baltimore v. LutcherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API