Legal Opinion

Heeney v. Alcock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 7, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Mason B. Loomis, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, P. J.

This appeal is prosecuted to reverse the judgment of the county court, overruling appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered by confession, or to stay proceedings under the judgment, until a trial can be had upon the merits. The note and warrant of attorney which was under seal, were executed in the name of “ Heeney & Son,” the note being dated February 23, 1881, payable to appellees on demand, after date.

Upon the hearing of the motion, affidavits of both the appellants were read, in support of the motion, tending strongly to show that the note was not given for any indebtedness of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Burwell v. OrrIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Norton v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elkins v. WolfeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API