State v. Lofton
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMES, Justice.
We have for review Lofton v. State, 517 So.2d 700 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), because the district court issued a per curiam decision without opinion citing two cases which were pending review in this Court, State v. Frierson, No. 71,102 and State v. Kersey, No. 71,568.* In Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981), we held that a per curiam decision without opinion of a district court of appeal which cites as controlling authority a decision that is pending review in this Court constitutes prima facie express conflict for purposes of jurisdiction. Thus, we have jurisdiction pursuant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- McCuiston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Frierson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Hester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dowling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992