Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Bunting

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 30, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This case, in dealing with the construction of the words of the deed, calls into play certain intricate and abstruse terms of property law which many courts and writers have used interchangeably with confusing results. This, in a measure, may be seen from the stipulation where the plaintiff claims that the deed in question conveyed a “limited,” “base,” “qualified” or “determinable” fee. Each of these terms have been used by certain authorities and often in contra-distinction to each other. The term “limitation” is not strictly accurate when used…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. First Universalist Society of North Adams v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Dolby v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. First Reformed Dutch Church v. CroswellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Delaware Land & Development Co. v. First & Central Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Delaware · 1929
  5. Green v. GreshamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Addy v. ShortSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Addy v. ShortSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Bailey v. Eagle Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bridges v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Penn Central Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API