Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hampel

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1928No. 269PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

J. H. P. Davis &' Co. of Fort Bend County, Texas, partners, were adjudicated bankrupts both as a firm and individually. They were hankers and depositories of County funds. As such they had given two joint and several bonds both signed by the firm in its firm name as principal and by some of the members of the firm individually, with others, as sureties. The County sought to prove its claim, not only against the firm but also against the separate estates of the surviving members, all of whom had bound themselves severally as well as jointly. The double proof was allowed by the District Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Robinson v. Seaboard Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. In Re Hurley Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. In Re United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Wirtz v. Edisto Farms DairyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
  5. Eads Hide & Wool Company v. L. B. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API