Legal Opinion

Norsan Products, Inc. v. R. F. Schuele Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 28, 1968No. 64-C-245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

This is an action for an injunction against the infringement of a trademark. No damages are sought.

Undisputed Facts

Plaintiff is an Ohio corporation with its principal office in Milwaukee and produces a liquid stain remover called “Kuf ’N Kolar.” This stain remover has been manufactured continuously since July 19, 1958, under the mark “Kuf ’N Kolar.” Sales since that time have exceeded 750,000 bottles. Plaintiff has spent approximately $50,000 in direct advertising and promotion of its product. Plaintiff has spent at least $10,000 for display racks for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Screw Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  3. Food Fair Stores, Inc., a Corporation v. Lakeland Grocery Corp., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Keller Products, Inc. v. Rubber Linings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. American Ass'n for Advancement of Science v. Hearst Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  3. Premier Electronics Lab v. AstonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API