Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Sandlin

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1983No. Docket 63219PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict of $80,000 in favor of plaintiff. On appeal, defendants raise numerous issues, none of which require reversal.

Defendants first urge that the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. According to defendants, plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a jury question as to the issues of negligence, duty and proximate cause. We disagree. We note that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be denied if, viewing the facts in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Samson v. Saginaw Professional Building, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pippen v. Denison Division of Abex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Schultz Ex Rel. Schultz v. Gould AcademySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Duane Martin and Robert Rick v. The Joseph Harris Co., Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Krass v. Tri-County Security, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Rosh v. Cave Imaging Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API