Tucker v. Sandlin
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal as of right from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict of $80,000 in favor of plaintiff. On appeal, defendants raise numerous issues, none of which require reversal.
Defendants first urge that the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. According to defendants, plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a jury question as to the issues of negligence, duty and proximate cause. We disagree. We note that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be denied if, viewing the facts in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Samson v. Saginaw Professional Building, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Pippen v. Denison Division of Abex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Schultz Ex Rel. Schultz v. Gould AcademySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Duane Martin and Robert Rick v. The Joseph Harris Co., Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Krass v. Tri-County Security, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rosh v. Cave Imaging Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Kovacs v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.