Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1914No. 7893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Montague County Court; Levy Walker, Judge. Action by F. M. Clark against the Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

F. M. Clark recovered a judgment against the Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Company for damages on account of injuries to two mules, from which judgment the defendant has appealed.

In his petition the plaintiff alleged that on or about November 12, 1912, while he was driving the mules, together with other animals, along a public road adjacent to the defendant’s right of way, and while one of the defendant’s trains was passing him, the operatives of the engine negligently frightened the mules by blowing the locomotive whistle, which caused the mules to run and injure themselves upon a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ulit v. Biggs, Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moran Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API