Legal Opinion

Pulsifer v. Ardito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), dated June 28, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, (2) from a judgment of the same court entered July 9, 2002, which, upon the order dated June 28, 2002, is in favor of the defendants and against them, dismissing the complaint, and (3), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated September 23, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Wittich v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hilpert v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Kistamma v. Saintilus-AlceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  3. Krongauz v. RottensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API