Commonwealth v. Carson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This appeal raises the question of whether the federal rule that jeopardy attaches once a jury is sworn, Illinois v. Somerville, 410 U.S. 458, 93 S.Ct. 1066, 35 L.Ed.2d 425 (1973); United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 91 S.Ct. 547, 27 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971); Downum v. United States, 372 U.S. 734, 83 S.Ct. 1033, 10 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963); United States v. Pecora, 484 F.2d 1289 (3d Cir. 1973), is of federal constitutional dimension and therefore must be applied in state proceedings.1
-1-
Appellant was charged with delivery of one ounce of marijuana in violation of the Controlled Substance,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MeekinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BradleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. BaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.