Legal Opinion

Estate of Clark v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 14, 1948No. Docket No. 11921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

LeMire, Judge:

It has been held that defects, such as the one claimed here, in the mailing of a notice of deficiency are cured where the taxpayer receives the notice and timely files a petition on the merits. See Commissioner v. New York Trust Co., 54 Fed. (2d) 463; Olsen v. Helvering, 88 Fed. (2d) 650; Commissioner v. Rosenheim, 132 Fed. (2d) 677; Kay Manufacturing Co., 18 B. T. A. 753; affirmed per curiam, 53 Fed. (2d) 1083; Bankers Trust Co., Trustee, 24 B. T. A. 10; Corinne Porter Scruggs, Administratrix, 29 B. T. A. 1102.

On the facts here, however, we can not find that the notice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brzezinski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  2. Camous v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Goldstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  4. Marcus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  5. Brzezinski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API