Estate of Clark v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
LeMire, Judge:
It has been held that defects, such as the one claimed here, in the mailing of a notice of deficiency are cured where the taxpayer receives the notice and timely files a petition on the merits. See Commissioner v. New York Trust Co., 54 Fed. (2d) 463; Olsen v. Helvering, 88 Fed. (2d) 650; Commissioner v. Rosenheim, 132 Fed. (2d) 677; Kay Manufacturing Co., 18 B. T. A. 753; affirmed per curiam, 53 Fed. (2d) 1083; Bankers Trust Co., Trustee, 24 B. T. A. 10; Corinne Porter Scruggs, Administratrix, 29 B. T. A. 1102.
On the facts here, however, we can not find that the notice…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hurd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brzezinski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Camous v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- Goldstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Marcus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Brzezinski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.