Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gladstone v. Kling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 1966No. F-356Published

1ConcurrenceSturgis, Judge

Being of the view that on the remand plaintiff may obtain leave to file such affirmative defenses to the counterclaim as she may be advised, I concur in the result.

It is noted that the transactions relating to the purchase of the mortgaged property and the giving of the purchase money mortgage and note in suit took place exclusively between defendant Maurice B. Gladstone, an attorney at law, and plaintiff’s husband, Leroy A. Kling, since deceased, who acted for their wives in the premises. I am therefore led to suspect that the defendants were as well aware of the legal consequences of their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kling v. GladstoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API