Legal Opinion

Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1947No. A-811Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

2Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander

In the original opinion we stated that the bond indenture was *632executed at the same time the other instruments were executed. In the motion for rehearing it is pointed out that, while the bond indenture was delivered at the same time the other instruments were executed, it was actually signed and acknowledged several days prior thereto. However, in our opinion, this is not material. As a general rule, delivery is an essential element of the execution of a written instrument. 17 C. J. S. 414; 10 Tex. Jur. 267; 15 Words and Phrases 546; Black’s Law Dictionary (De Luxe Ed.), p. 716;…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Thomason v. BerryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Planters' Oil Co. v. Hill Printing & Stationery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API