Gulf Refining Co. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This case presents the question whether, in the case of a cargo, insured under a valued policy, which has suffered a general average contribution, the in*679sored is coinsurer to the extent that the sound value of the cargo is more than the agreed value. The record does not show whether the cargo was undervalued at the port of lading, or whether on the voyage it increased in value; for this reason we ignore the first possibility, without suggesting that it makes any difference. The issue, as the books repeatedly say, is of no grave consequence, once the rule is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- International Nav. Co. v. Atlantic Mut. Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- Clark v. United Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Providence & Stonington Steamship Co. v. Phoenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- British & Foreign Marine Ins. v. Maldonado & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ManibusanSuperior Court of Guam · 2024