Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Heiatzman

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided January 23, 1912Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, J.—

I think the objection of the jurisdiction of the equity court in this case is fatal. The bill is filed by judgment creditors of Albert M. Horner, to have applied in satisfaction of their judgment money which it is alleged the defendant, Mrs. Goodwin, owed Horner as the purchase price of property bought at the foreclosure of a mortgage upon it. It is not a bill to set aside any conveyance or act. (Code, Art. 16, Sec. 46. Bagby’s Code, Sec. 47.)

It is prayed that the mortgage referred to, be declared to have been owned, in fact, by Horner; but that would be merely as a step in ascer*174taini…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morton v. GrafflinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Frederick County Nat. Bank v. ShaferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Balls v. BallsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Sumwalt v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API