Legal Opinion

James v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1938No. 7 Div. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The constitution of this State, section 6, provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, except by due process of law; and, as has been, often stated, “it is the manifest purpose of this provision to accord to the citizen security against, the arbitrary action of those in authority, and to place him under the protection of the ‘law of the land/' which is synonymous with the expression, ‘due process of law/ ”

In order that it may be affirmatively ascertained that due process of law prevails in every criminal case, the statute makes it incumbent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gunter v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Adams v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Haynes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Ex parte RodgersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dismukes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Foster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Moses v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Moses v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API