In re Jane Doe 13-A

I write this “dissental”3 from the Court’s decision to deny en banc eonsider-*756ation pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331. I elect to write because the inability of the three-judge panel to provide a clear analysis of the parental bypass appellate review standard warrants en banc consideration. Further, the failure of our whole court to address and give deference to the proper appellate standard of review concerning parental notification is a mistake.

I agree with the views expressed by Chief Judge Kozinski when he wrote:

“Cases arguably warranting en bane review are those in…