Legal Opinion

In re Hotchkiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Dutchess county affirmed, with costs.— Appeal from a decree of the surrogate of the •county of Dutchess, denying an application to sell real estate for the payment of debts.—

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

This appeal is from a decree of the surrogate of Dutchess county, -denying a petition of Hotchkiss, as adminis- • t-rator, etc., of John 0. Bronson, deceased, for an order to sell the real estate of the de-ceased for the payment of his debts. Dr. - John O. Bronson died in March, 1897, leaving him surviving his widow, Martha P. Bron-son, and three sisters, Mrs. Williams, Mrs. Hinton and Mrs. Clark. Hotchkiss and the ' widow were appointed administrators. The widow died in February, 1898,. and Hotchkiss was appointed administrator. Her heirs at Jaw were Hotchkiss and two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Albany v. . McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. First National Bank of Ballston Spa v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Wright v. . GarlinghouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
  2. In re the Sale of Real Estate to Pay Debts of RiderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API