Legal Opinion

Auer v. Mathews

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for' Oneida ■county: W. O. Silverthorn, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

This is an action in equity to reform and specifically enforce a written contract for the conveyance of lands. There is very little dispute as to the facts. Plaintiff owned a house and lot in Milwaukee, and defendant owned a quantity of cut-over timber lands in town 39 north of range 8 east, and town 39 north of range 9 east,'in Oneida county. October 30, 1902, they entered into a written agreement by which plaintiff agreed to convey to defendant the house and lot and defendant agreed to convey to plaintiff “forty-seven descriptions located in sections 1, 5 [etc., enumerating a large number…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Combs v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Schmeling v. KrieselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Buck v. PondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Kaukauna Electric Light Co. v. City of KaukaunaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Singleton v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grant Marble Co. v. AbbotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Goldstine v. TolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Daubmyre v. HunterSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. Lindenberger v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Korte v. O'NeillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API