Legal Opinion

Napier v. Napier

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to Grant Maintenance.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Carroll—

Overruling motion to grant maintenance.

The appellant, Martha Napier, brought her action in the Laurel circuit court seeking to recover alimony in the sum of $2,000.00 from her husband, the appellee, William Napier. Pending the action and before the case had been prepared for submission she was allowed by the lower court $75.00 maintenance. After this she made a motion for another allowance which the court refused to make, and thereafter the case coming on to be heard there was a judgment dismissing her petition and refusing* alimony. Prom this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pemberton v. PembertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Ex parte FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kreiger v. KreigerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Hertel v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Heskamp v. HeskampCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Cadden v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API