Federal Life Ins. v. Bailey

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff in er-to* "was sned by defendant in error on a policy of accident insurance; being east, it brings error in conventional form,

Defendant in error, as beneficiary in the policy in controversy, brought an action at law against plaintiff in error for the sum of $5,000, bottomed upon the death by aecident of the insured, who in his lifetime was the husband of defendant in error. The par-ties wül be designated as they were in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s decedent took out the policy of accident insurance on the 23 d day of January, 1918, and renewed it from time to…