Legal Opinion

Quigley & Co. v. Shedd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal iii error from the Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. TI. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Quigley & Co. brought this suit against E. A. Shedd and C. IT. Pond on the following written contract, namely:

“This memorandum of agreement, made this the 21st day of November, 1898, between R. M. Quigley & Co. and E. A. Shedd and C. PI. Pond, witnesseth:

“'Whereas, The said Quigley & Co. entered into a contract with said Shedd and Pond, on April 2, 1898, to build the pile trestles and lay the tracks on the lines of the new roads between Tutwiler, Miss., and "Ruleville, Miss., and between Moorehead, Miss., and Lake Dawson, Miss.;

“Ahd, whereas, It is desired to terminate and cancel the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hines v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Toomey v. AtyoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Barker v. FreelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lewis v. TurnleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Lyons v. StillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McQuiddy Printing Co. v. HirsigCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  2. American Publishing Co. v. GambleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Johnson v. Continental Insurance Co. of New YorkTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. G. A. Kelly Plow Co. v. LondonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. In re Clairfield Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API