Legal Opinion

Fidelity Deposit Company v. Fairfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1925Published

1Opinion

Smith, J.,

(on rehearing). In the brief of counsel for appellee in support of the petition for rehearing--it is insisted that we erred in holding that the error complained of was one that could have been corrected on the first appeal, and in support of this contention the case of Foohs v. Bilby, 95 Ark. 302, is cited.

We do not concur in the view of counsel that the case cited has any application here. The Foohs case was a law case; the instant case is one in equity. Upon appeal from the circuit court we do not try the case de novo. We only rqview the errors assigned. In chancery appeals we do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foohs v. BilbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. FairfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API