Legal Opinion

Loew v. Ostreicher Bros.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1921Published

Motion by the defendant to require the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint wherein he shall separately state and number the facts constituting the various causes of action now embraced in the complaint herein.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The defendant moves for an order requiring the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint wherein he shall separately state and number the facts constituting the various causes of action claimed to be embraced in the complaint. The complaint in substance alleges that while the plaintiff was lawfully in and upon the premises occupied by the defendant as a merchant tailor in the borough of Manhattan, New York city, the agents and servants of the defendant, with the knowledge and consent of said defendant and in the course of its business, without the slightest cause or provocation, threw or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Tyson v. Joseph H. Bauland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Blake v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bock v. BohnNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API