State v. Sutter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Defendant was convicted of violating sec. 939.32 (1), Stats., by attempting to violate sec. 944.01 (1). Sec. 959.15, sometimes referred to as the sex-deviate law, provides in part:
“(1) If a person is convicted under . . . section 939.32 for attempting to violate section 944.01 . . . the court shall commit him to the state department of public welfare for a presentence social, physical, and mental examination.” The municipal court inadvertently failed to comply with this statute in the case before us and ordered a presentence investigation which did not include physical and mental examination,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. Stang Tank LineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Copas v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967