Legal Opinion

State v. Sutter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating sec. 939.32 (1), Stats., by attempting to violate sec. 944.01 (1). Sec. 959.15, sometimes referred to as the sex-deviate law, provides in part:

“(1) If a person is convicted under . . . section 939.32 for attempting to violate section 944.01 . . . the court shall commit him to the state department of public welfare for a presentence social, physical, and mental examination.” The municipal court inadvertently failed to comply with this statute in the case before us and ordered a presentence investigation which did not include physical and mental examination,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Stang Tank LineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Copas v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API