Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 19, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERNBERG, Justice.

The movant (Barnes) seeks to recover damages from the respondent (The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (C&O)) for personal injuries received by him while employed by the Holland Company (Holland), allegedly the agent of C&O. The primary question is: By whom was Barnes employed at the time of his injuries?

Barnes charges that the C&O is using Holland as a subterfuge to avoid the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). He further states that in truth and in fact Holland is the agent of C&O and he, in turn, as an employee of Holland at the time of his injuries was actually an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. De Paola v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
  2. Search v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API