Barnes v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Justice.
The movant (Barnes) seeks to recover damages from the respondent (The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (C&O)) for personal injuries received by him while employed by the Holland Company (Holland), allegedly the agent of C&O. The primary question is: By whom was Barnes employed at the time of his injuries?
Barnes charges that the C&O is using Holland as a subterfuge to avoid the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). He further states that in truth and in fact Holland is the agent of C&O and he, in turn, as an employee of Holland at the time of his injuries was actually an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- De Paola v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
- Search v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1982