Legal Opinion

In Re Green

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 19, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ORIGINAL. No number.. This was a petition for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus. The averments in the petition, upon which the prayer was founded, are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eield

' It appears from the petition of the applicant, which he asks leave to file, that he has been disbarred, from .the practice of law as an attorney and .counsellor, in the courts of Colorado by order of the Supreme Coiirt of that State, and he prays for a writ of mandamus from this court commanding the judges of that court to restore him to his office and to vacate the order óf disbarment.

The ground of the disbarment, as shown by the petition and the opinion of the Supreme Court of Colorado, to which it refers, was vituperative and denunciatory language used by the applicant in the pleadings…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Emanuel JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  2. Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Ex Parte BuderSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API