Legal Opinion

Spink v. Spink

Hamilton Circuit Court

Decided November 18, 1905Published

ERROR to Hamilton common pleas court.

1Opinion of the CourtJelke, J.

These [two] cases arose in the probate court on the application of Alphonsa Spink, administratrix of the estates of Alfred Spink am? Alphonse Spink, respectively, under provision of Rev. Stat. 6100 (Lan.. 9639) :

“Whenever an executor or administrator shall present to the-probate court for its allowance, any debt or claim of which he is the owner, against the estate which he represents, amounting to fifty dollars or more, the court shall fix a day, not less than four weeks nor* more than six weeks from the presentation of the said debt or claim* *95when the testimony touching said debt or claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. In re the Final Account of BesondySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. In re KaneNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  4. Freybe v. TiernanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Osborne v. VanHornSupreme Court of Florida · 1848

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API