Legal Opinion

Antone v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1920No. 2234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, C. J..

(after stating the facts as above). Careful consideration of the record has convinced us that plaintiff in error’s insistence that the instructions to the jury in connection with the issue set out in the statement above were erroneous because calculated to mislead them in that thereby they were authorized to determine the location of the Singleton survey on the ground with reference to surveys thereof made by other surveyors than the one who made the field notes on which it was patented should be sustained. The contention is predicated on the failure of the trial court, when he…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antone v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Antone v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API