Legal Opinion

Kane v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1993No. SC S40230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner objects to a revised ballot title certified by the Attorney General under ORS 250.067(2). Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), petitioner earlier had submitted objections to a draft ballot title prepared by the Attorney General. The Attorney General accepted one of petitioner’s suggested changes to the Caption and made other changes to the draft ballot title as a result of suggestions made by others.

Upon consideration of petitioner’s objection to the revised Caption certified by the Attorney General, we are satisfied that the revised Caption “reasonably identifies the subject of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hand v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kafoury v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API