Legal Opinion
Reserve Finance Corp. v. Rosen
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This proceeding was instituted by the landlord, Reserve Finance Corporation, to remove the tenant, LoMs H. Rosen, from certain leased premises for non-payment of rent. The petition was made by Elmer C. Doll, as agent for the landlord. Thematerial allegations of the petition are stated positively, and not on information and belief. In addition, the petition contains a recital that Doll is the agent for the Reserve Finance Corporation, and duly authorized by it to institute and prosecute the proceeding. The petition is verified by Doll in the usual manner for the verification of a pleading by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Summary Proceeding Brought by the Stuyvensant Real Estate Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
- Powers v. De O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Holzderber v. ForrestalNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. WashingtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Hanover Estates, lnc. v. FinkelsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Teachers College v. WolterdingCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Barstow Road Owners, Inc. v. BillingNassau County District Court · 1998
- Emray Realty Corp. v. EdwardsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958