Legal Opinion

Shields v. . Payne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1879Published

Civil Actiok tried at Fall Terra, 1878, of Guilford Superior Court, before Kerr, J- This action was brought to recover the sum of $450 al--. leged to be due on a special contract entered into between the plaintiff and defendant’s intestate.

Read the full summary

Civil Actiok tried at Fall Terra, 1878, of Guilford Superior Court, before Kerr, J- This action was brought to recover the sum of $450 al--. leged to be due on a special contract entered into between the plaintiff and defendant’s intestate. The parties agreed” to submit a single issue to the jury in these words; “Does the defendant, as administrator, owe the plaintiff $450 on special contract for two ponies, a buggy, and two sets of harness?” The evidence given on the trial of the issue was in substaneé as follows; The intestate of defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for a lot bought of…

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, C. J,-

(After stating the case.) In our opinion, both rulings were 'Correct The questions will be examined in order:

1. The superior court has jurisdiction of the cause by the -express words of .the .statute. Bat Rev., ch. 45, § 133. This .section enacts that “ .an action may he brought by a creditor against an executor, .administrator or collector on a demand at any time after it is due. But no execution shall issue against the executor, administrator or collector, on a judgment therein against him without leave of the court, after notice,” &c. If- the provision is, by construction, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heilig v. . FoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Ballard v. . KilpatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API