Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Brinkmeier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1907No. 14,902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.-

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

Henry Brinkmeier commenced this action in the district court of Sedgwick county against «the Missouri Pacific Railway Company to recover dam.ages for personal injuries received while in its employment as a brakeman. He recovered a judgment for $6500, and the railway company brings the case here for review.

The controlling facts are not seriously disputed. The controversy arises principally upon the construction of sections 2 and 8 of the act of congress • enacted March 2, 1893, entitled “An act to promote the safety of employees and travelers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Voelker v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1902
  4. United States v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1905
  5. United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. DelkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  2. Brinkmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Cochran v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. United States v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API