Virginia Retirement System v. Cirillo
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HALEY, Judge.
I
The Virginia Retirement System (VRS) maintains: (1) the trial court erred in concluding that the administrative decision denying benefits to Susan E. Cirillo (Cirillo) did not comply with Code § 2.2-4019(A)(v) of the Virginia Administrative Process Act (VAPA) requiring Cirillo be informed “briefly and in writing, of the factual or procedural basis” of that decision; (2) even assuming the trial court was correct as to its initial decision, authorized by Code § 2.2-4027 of the VAPA, that court, nonetheless, exceeded its remedial authority under Code § 2.2-4029 in directing the VRS…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Virginia Retirement System v. Ricky A. BlairCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
- Friends of Buckingham v. State Air Pollution ControlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Chesapeake Hospital Authority d/b/a, etc. v. State Health Commissioner and Sentara HospitalsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
- Chesapeake Hospital Authority v. State Health CommissionerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2022
- Danville Regional Medical Center v. Virginia Birth-Related Neurological InjuryCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.