Legal Opinion

Coukoulis v. Schwartz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 7, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

On March 23, 1938, defendant appellant, hereinafter called defendant, filed in this court her petition asking leave to appeal from an order of the trial court granting to plaintiff appellee, hereinafter called plaintiff, a new trial. We allowed this petition and the appeal is prosecuted in pursuance thereof. The trial court granted the new trial “for the reason of errors in the instructions given to the jury by the court.”

We do not feel that we are concerned here with the giving or refusal of peremptory instructions, or with the question of an intervening cause being the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peters v. MadiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. Adamsen v. MagneliaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Tanner v. ClappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  4. Tracey v. Chicago Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Darby v. Checker CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Wolpert v. HeidbrederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  4. Olson v. Peter Pan Bakery, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  5. Schwartzenberg v. Midwest Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API