Norris v. Dalrymple
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 98, April T., 1901, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Warren Co., Dec. T., 1898, No. 57, on verdict for defendants in case of W. C. Norris v. Phcebe A. Dalrymple and A. S. Dalrymple. Ejectment for a strip of land two and seven tenths feet wide in the borough of Warren. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 98, April T., 1901, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Warren Co., Dec. T., 1898, No. 57, on verdict for defendants in case of W. C. Norris v. Phcebe A. Dalrymple and A. S. Dalrymple. Ejectment for a strip of land two and seven tenths feet wide in the borough of Warren. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Under objection and exception A. S. Dalrymple was permitted to testify as to the boundary line pointed out to him by Stephen Carver. [1] Plaintiff’s points were as follows : 3. If Carver and Dalrymple in locating the division line between them at the time…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
Lot No. 105 in the borough of Warren fronts west upon Market street and south upon Fifth street. Lot No. 104 adjoins it on the north. Lot No. 106 fronts east on East street and south on Fifth street. Lot No. 103 adjoins it on the north. These lots have a common boundary at or about the center of the square formed by Market, Fifth, East and Sixth streets There is no public alley between them. In 1856 a fence, which had evidently been built for several years, and the east side of a barn erected upon the northeast corner of lot No. 104 constituted the north and south…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reiter v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caputo Et Ux. v. Mariatti Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934