Legal Opinion

Voss v. City of Middleton

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 5, 1990No. 89-1519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.

Robert Voss and the City of Madison appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their complaint against the City of Middleton. They had sought a declaratory judgment voiding Middleton's vacation of a ten-foot portion of a street dead-ending at the Middleton-Madison line. The dispositive issue is whether Madison and Voss are the owners of property "abutting" the portion of the street proposed to be vacated within the meaning of sec. 66.296(2)(c), Stats.1 If they are, the statute gives them the power to "veto" the vacation. We *267conclude that the statute is plain and unambiguous, and that Voss and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  2. Royal Transit, Inc. v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Good Deal of Ivy Hill, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Crenshaw v. City of BelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API