Legal Opinion
Town of Minturn v. Sensible Housing Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 9, 2012No. 10SC670PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
T1 We granted certiorari in this case to review the court of appeals' decision in Sensible Housing Co., Inc. v. Town of Minturn, No. 09CA1824, 2010 WL 8259829 (Colo.App. Aug. 19, 2010). 1 The court of appeals voided nine annexation ordinances adopted by the Town of Minturn, ruling that, under priority of jurisdiction, Minturn should have stayed its annexation actions in the face of a prior-commenced and ongoing quiet title action regarding a disputed portion of the annexed property. We disagree and reverse.
$2 In 2008, Minturn enacted annexation ordinances for nine parcels of property in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Mountain States Power Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Universal Gypsum of Georgia, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Banning Lewis Ranch Co. v. City of Colorado Springs (In re Banning Lewis Ranch Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Commandeer Realty Associates, Inc. v. AllegroNew York Supreme Court · 2015