Legal Opinion

Gramazio v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., No. X01cv00-0160391s (May 24, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 24, 2001No. X01CV00-0160391SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

In the above-captioned action, the plaintiffs allege that on July 28, 1999, defendant Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. negligently allowed the public water supply in an area of Stratford and Shelton to be contaminated by a back flow released during a test of Sikorsky's sprinkler system (Count I), and negligently failed to warn the public about and respond to the situation (Count 2). The plaintiffs allege that defendant Bridgeport Hydraulic Company ("BHC"), which operates…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API