Johnston v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before us today is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs’ Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, leave to amend is DENIED.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In September, 1993, Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the City under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1981), alleging that the City discriminates against women by the method it uses to hire recruits to be police cadets. Each Plaintiff received Right to Sue letters from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on the grounds of gender discrimination under Title VII.
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Centifanti v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Cuffy v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1986
- Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Power Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller Products Co. v. Veltek Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003