Legal Opinion

Hopple v. Cleveland Discount Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This cause comes into this court both on appeal and error, the error case being entitled the A. & J. Frank Company v. Sarah E. Saylor et al., and on consideration the error proceedings are dismissed and the appeal heard, as the law provides, de novo.

The A. & J. Frank Company is a corporation doing a brokerage business, and filed exceptions to the report of the special master herein, and to the order of the common pleas court of Cuyahoga county confirming the report and allowing the claim of Sarah E. Saylor against the Cleveland Discount Company, and rejecting the claim of the A. & J. Frank…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edgar v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Fountain v. BighamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Ruple ex rel. Lewis v. BindleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Saba, Admr. v. Clev. Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Longcrick v. KrumholtzOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API