Legal Opinion

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports

Decided April 23, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Phillip R. Rumsey, Esq. Town Attorney, Cortlandville

You have asked whether a town may provide for mandatory fines for violations of local dog control regulations. Your concern is that a mandatory fine for conviction would remove the discretion of a local court to determine an appropriate fine.

Municipalities are authorized to enact local laws or ordinances regarding the keeping or running at large of dogs, may impose civil or criminal penalties for violations of the regulations and may provide for the issuance of appearance tickets in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Siegal v. DrosNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. People ex rel. Siegal v. DrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API