Beasley v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Stabler.
The history of this controversy and. .the issues involved are fully set out in the elaborate decree of the Circuit Judge and need not be repeated or restated here. We think, from a careful study of the record, that the conclusions and holdings of Judge Mann are correct, except as to the alleged defense that the contract of insurance, if made, was a wagering one. It appears from the more recent decisions of this Court that this defense is available to the insurer after the period of contestability has run, for the reason that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Henderson v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Hack v. MetzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tulipano v. US Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Abraham v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Beasley v. General American Life Ins.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1935
- Bankers Security Life Insurance Co. v. KillingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955